⌘S
Control+S /
GW
RBC ISO 27001 · Q1 2026 / ISO 27001:2022 / 5. Organizational controls / A.5.1 Policies for information security
A.5.1 ISO 27001:2022 Organizational Priority: high

Policies for information security

Not reviewed · Last AI run 2h ago · 3 mappings pending
Information security policy and topic-specific policies shall be defined, approved by management, published, communicated to and acknowledged by relevant personnel and relevant interested parties, and reviewed at planned intervals and if significant changes occur. Topic-specific policies should typically address: a) access control b) physical and environmental security c) asset management d) information transfer e) secure configuration and handling of user endpoint devices f) network security g) information security incident management
Verdict
3/5
AI 3.0 · Override
Final = AI score (no human override)
AI rationale

Information security policy is documented and approved (firewall config screenshot + asset list confirm policy is in force). However, no evidence yet of scheduled review intervals or topic-specific policies for incident management or information transfer. Score reflects partial coverage of the control's requirements.

Gaps (3)
  • ·No evidence of scheduled policy review intervals
  • ·Topic-specific policies for incident management not documented
  • ·Information transfer policy not provided
Recommendations (2)
  • ·Request annual review log from IT governance
  • ·Request topic-specific policy index (covers items b, d, g)

Mapped evidence 5 cited · 1 pending review

📄
Information_Security_Policy_v3.2.pdf document 3/5 · approved

AI rationale: Document is the formal information security policy, approved by CISO 2025-09-12. Covers items (a) access control and (e) endpoint security. Score 3 reflects partial topic coverage…

Captured 2026-04-12 · Also maps to A.5.10, A.5.32
🖼
Firewall config — Palo Alto admin panel.png screenshot 3/5 · approved

AI rationale: Demonstrates that policy is technically enforced via firewall ACLs. Supports item (f) network security…

Captured 2026-04-15 · Also maps to A.8.20
📊
asset_inventory_2026Q1.csv configuration 2/5 · pending · low confidence

AI rationale: Asset inventory is tangentially relevant — confirms scope of policy enforcement but doesn't directly evidence the policy itself. Suggest unmapping.

· suggested action: unmap
✍️
Observation: CISO confirmed annual review cycle in call observation human-authored

Spoke with David Chen (CISO) on 2026-04-22. Confirmed policy is reviewed annually each Q3 by the IT governance committee. Next review scheduled for 2026-09. Evidence to be requested.

By G. Wang · 2026-04-22

Discussion 2 comments · 1 unresolved

AM
Anouar M. 2026-04-20 · Reviewer

Score feels low. The asset list shouldn't really count against this control — it's a different kind of evidence. Suggest unmapping the CSV and bumping to 3.

GW
George W. 2026-04-22 · Consultant

Agreed. Will add observation from CISO call and unmap the CSV. Need to request the annual review log from David's team.

GW
Activity 12 events · last 7 days
George W. added observation · 2h ago
AI suggested 1 mapping (asset_inventory) · 4h ago
Anouar M. commented · yesterday
George W. uploaded firewall screenshot · 4d ago
AI generated initial mappings (3) · 4d ago
A.5.1 · pending review · use shortcuts A approve R remap V revisit

Design notes (where this maps to OOUX)

Six slots (per 09 — Slot Components)
  • 1. Identity — control ID, title, status chip, breadcrumb
  • 2. Verdict — score with AI/Override distinction, gaps, recommendations
  • 3. Relationships — Mapped evidence, with peek-able rows
  • 4. Discussion — anchored thread on this control
  • 5. Activity — chronological audit trail
  • 6. Actions — sticky bottom bar (the three CTAs)
Audience filter (per 02 — Audiences)
  • Toggle top-right: Consultant / Reviewer / Client
  • Reviewer: hides Re-run AI, Override score, Add evidence
  • Client: hides AI rationale text, Action bar; verdict shows final only
  • Same blob, slot visibility differs
Annotations honored
  • 1:61 — Project hierarchy distinct in left nav
  • 1:62 — Right rail with framework index
  • 1:55 — ⌘E evidence peek shortcut hint top-right
  • 1:56–58 — Control text preserves PDF newlines
  • 1:59 — Status uses word + color + icon, not just dots
  • 1:60 — "Map evidence" inline with the section header

What's not in this mockup yet